HP ENVY m7 Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP ENVY m7 Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80E6
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '23 at 14:34
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 131
51% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 140
17% 132 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
HP(103C 80E6) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 11.9
10% 11.5 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 8.7
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1TB
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52020100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 308 311 377 404 332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 276
Write 312
Mixed 282
SusWrite 338
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 21.4
74% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 234
156% 186 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate USB 120GB
28GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 15.9
Write 29.3
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 31.8
36% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1XS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY m7 Notebook Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY m7 Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback