Gigabyte GA-H610M H DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H610M H DDR4  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '23 at 09:52
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 173
2-Core 308
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 791
84% 670 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 86.3
51% 70.7 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 47.3
48% 60.4 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS250G 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103L0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,363
Write 81.2
Mixed 743
158% 729 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 11.9
120% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 340
218% 258 MB/s
Poor: 120% Great: 222%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
500GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 461
Write 423
Mixed 345
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 48.2
170% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 251
209% 303 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1827CH.008 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 37
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H610M H DDR4 Builds (Compare 2,860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H610M H DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback