HP EliteBook 855 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 855 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8895
Memory18.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221014
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 07:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 264
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 740
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8895) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.40.11
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 28.4
16% 20.3 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 22.4
17% 19.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA512QFD-1AX1AABHA 512GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 791 752 681 811 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,258
Write 914
Mixed 840
SusWrite 639
204% 912 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 49.6
165% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 469
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 299
241% 345 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 157%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 27.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 855 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 855 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback