Lenovo 20XLCTO1WW

Performance Results

Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20XLCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20XLCTO1WW
Memory41 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220121
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 02 '22 at 21:20
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 38
1-Core 66
2-Core 127
42% 77 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 364
34% 285 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 5094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver:
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.63% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 13.7
7% 12 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 12.7
10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.63%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 445 433 497 491 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 556
Write 424
Mixed 460
SusWrite 464
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 41.7
136% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 428
275% 322 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 105%
Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB2GS6CMR6N-XN Ramaxel RMSA3330ME88HCF-3200 47GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $285Nvidia RTX 4060 $285Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12400F $146Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4070 $530Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $346SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback