Today's hottest deals

Foxconn H67S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H67S  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110223
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 04:45
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 156
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 289
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 304B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 414
Mixed 9.5
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 7.53 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
16GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 132 130 129 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 90.4
Write 89
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 129
59% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 103%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB
197GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 55.9
Write 21.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 24.6
37% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
27% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67S Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback