bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 03:32
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3970X-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 184
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 517
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
EVGA(3842 2791) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 57.8
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 79.3
47% 67.6 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 58.6
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 89 82 90 92 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 199
Write 56.3
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 84.2
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 234%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
737GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 149 151 149 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 172
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 149
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x424C453847334431383639444531545830 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 28.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback