Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170 4,850 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 73.6 1-Core 94.1 2-Core 187 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 356 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 4.5 3% 4.63 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maxsun 120GB E5 120GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 47 48 43 44 51 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 415 Write 116 Mixed 140 SusWrite 51.8 39% 181 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 14 98% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 39.9 63% 123 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 80%
Hitachi HTS723225A7A364 250GB 1,313 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 106GB free Firmware: A60W SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 57.2 Write 46.8 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 70.1 39% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G9K1 Samsung M391B5173QH0-CMA 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 17.7 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 15.6 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	355x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	339x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	220x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $288

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16