Asrock Z790 Pro RS/D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 138%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z790 Pro RS/D4  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 02:21
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 240
2-Core 478
141% 271 Pts
4-Core 959
8-Core 1,690
160% 1,325 Pts
64-Core 2,839
176% 2,839 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 138%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3255 MHz, MLim: 6249 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (164 fps cap detected)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 164
Parallax 164
134% 164 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 164
Splatting 164
134% 164 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 127%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 338 294 284 268 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 332
Write 331
Mixed 244
SusWrite 314
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 43.8
145% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 346
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 134%
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
67GB free
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 428 159 38 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 319
Write 299
Mixed 249
SusWrite 209
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 30.9
111% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 222
193% 285 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 96%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
137GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 353 367 352 358 379 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 334
Write 344
Mixed 304
SusWrite 374
77% 339 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 45.5
152% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 344
259% 346 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 130%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
1GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.1
Write 88.7
Mixed 49.2
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 62%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
3GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80
Write 87.3
Mixed 49.9
54% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 44%
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 79.4
Write 71.7
Mixed 48.9
50% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 52%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
348GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 110 111 110 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 118
Write 84.2
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 110
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 83%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 84 84 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 96.9
Write 89.1
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 83.7
112% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
184% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4400C19-8GTZKK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 56.1
MC Mixed 51.9
156% 54.6 GB/s
SC Read 35.3
SC Write 56.7
SC Mixed 38.5
124% 43.5 GB/s
Latency 50.1
80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 150%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z790 Pro RS/D4 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 308%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z790 Pro RS/D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback