HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 19:22
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 171
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 424
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 363 363 362 362 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 362
Mixed 438
SusWrite 363
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 41.2
149% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 264
227% 335 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 104%
Great: 130%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
354GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 476 475 469 413 346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 474
Mixed 446
SusWrite 440
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 49.9
162% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 366
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 114%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9S3/8G KHX1866C11S3L/8G KHX1866C11S3L/8G KHX1866C9S3/8G 32GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 18.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback