TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu Celsius W420

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu Celsius W420  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3162-C1
Memory14.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 13:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 304
37% 286 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 65.2%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11D7) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.42%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-128 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 71 133 57 98 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 407
Write 265
Mixed 95
SusWrite 92.7
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 24.8
74% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 174
157% 235 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 57.3%
 Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
293GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 95.4
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 98.1
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 56.7%
 Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 46.2%
 Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Celsius W420 Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu Celsius W420

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples94x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples79x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples12x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples37x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples24x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples14x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples9x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples6x
870 QVO 2TBSamsung  $165Bench 102%, 41,734 samples6x
RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,893 samples10x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples7x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 1,445 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback