Asus PRIME Z790-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z790-P  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230609
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 11:59
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$291
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 221
2-Core 445
130% 251 Pts
4-Core 889
8-Core 1,722
155% 1,306 Pts
64-Core 3,156
195% 3,156 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 127%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 122
Parallax 140
109% 132 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 131
Splatting 111
111% 140 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLW128HEGR-00000 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 125 133 159 143 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,003
Write 737
Mixed 660
SusWrite 159
194% 890 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 89.1
326% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 710
562% 783 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 227%
Great: 227%
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB
26GB free
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 275 217 163 156 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 348
Write 272
Mixed 212
SusWrite 200
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 28.5
131% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 198
163% 231 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
40GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 314 317 300 308 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 474
Mixed 390
SusWrite 328
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 55.4
196% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 335
253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
102GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 436 447 454 440 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 474
Mixed 411
SusWrite 445
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 55.3
194% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
122GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 465 383 382 383 382 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 477
Mixed 441
SusWrite 413
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57
202% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 340
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5200 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
186% Outstanding
MC Read 78.2
MC Write 72.8
MC Mixed 69.1
210% 73.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 53.2
SC Mixed 31
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 186%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z790-P Builds (Compare 2,321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z790-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback