Lenovo 80WA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80WA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170616
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 10:04
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 144
57% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 255
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4219
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 36.8
Parallax 26.7
20% 29.2 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 2.7
16% 21.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Eaget S500 SSD 512GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 81 91 107 101 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 414
Write 204
Mixed 172
SusWrite 95.1
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 8.8
48% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 56.5
65% 111 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 0443 RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.2% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 18.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WA Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback