Fujitsu ESPRIMO D7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO D7010  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3823-A2
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 09:42
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 903
87% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,205
75% 1,205 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Sapphire(174B 8597) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 51.3
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 50.5
42% 52.5 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 44.6
42% 52.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,353
Write 1,812
Mixed 1,546
422% 1,904 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 80
271% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,241
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,115
833% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
737GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 185 185 187 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 107
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 186
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO D7010 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO D7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback