Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GD
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 03:06
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 132
52% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 412
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 13B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.1
6% 7.47 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N600 M.2 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1217A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 53 50 51 53 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 347
Write 304
Mixed 161
SusWrite 90.7
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 7.5
36% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 88.8
116% 208 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
771GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 75 75 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 109
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 76.6
59% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 02B5 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GD Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback