Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dynabook PORTEGE X30L-J (all builds)
Motherboard	Dynabook A010D/0001
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '23 at 00:46
Run Duration	63 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1135G7 36,962 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 66.2 1-Core 130 2-Core 204 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 480 50% 401 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(3100 0002) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 14.5 11% 14.4 fps	MRender 13.1 Gravity 15.3 Splatting 10 10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	71.7% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 21.6 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 16 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	43x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	14x
TOSHIBA MEMORY 512GBKbg40znv512gBench 141%, 135 samples	9x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	6x

RAM
1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 455 samples	15x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 73%, 24 samples	8x
1x8GBSamsungBench 32%, 1,334 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16