Lenovo 10B6CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10B6CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 23:25
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 34
1-Core 89
2-Core 178
52% 101 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 327
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3098) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.8
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 199 200 200 204 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 391
Write 331
Mixed 323
SusWrite 218
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 24.8
87% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 215
172% 248 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB
944GB free
Firmware: AC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 161 159 159 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 159
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 159
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90%
Great: 97%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
257GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 38 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 36.2
Write 38.6
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 37.8
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10B6CTO1WW Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10B6CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback