PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus B85M-G (all builds) |
Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140515 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 26 '23 at 16:18 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
67.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 227 212 207 201 198 MB/s
|
96.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0821
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 35 36 36 36 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 971x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 793x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 539x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 482x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 407x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 373x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $317 |