Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211203
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 03:13
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 77.4
1-Core 165
2-Core 306
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 767
80% 644 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 123
54% 88.6 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 33.2
55% 72.5 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$114
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2175 1926 1090 1120 1097 1112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1,493
Write 2,136
Mixed 1,659
SusWrite 1,420
380% 1,677 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 72
254% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,533
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 1383
1,026% 1,362 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 285%
Great: 306%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
130GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 215 205 211 214 251 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 343
Write 215
Mixed 287
SusWrite 237
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 32.9
121% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 167
155% 236 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 100%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 320GB
143GB free
Firmware: 7402
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 23,728
Mixed 62.1
8,500% 11,895 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 196 203 209 208 211 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 141
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 204
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 25.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 1,468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $824
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback