Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211203
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 02:57
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 169
2-Core 294
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 751
78% 630 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 77.1
Parallax 128
56% 91.2 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 33.4
45% 58.4 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$114
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2273 1341 1007 1095 1107 1115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1,452
Write 2,282
Mixed 1,614
SusWrite 1323
378% 1,667 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 73.8
266% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,546
DQ Write 1,196
DQ Mixed 1,371
1,026% 1,371 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 282%
Great: 306%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
130GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 206 314 231 293 273 MB/s
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.5% Good
Read 214
Write 94.3
Mixed 204
SusWrite 273
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 25
99% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 167
145% 209 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 100%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 320GB
143GB free
Firmware: 7402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 70.1
Write 67.9
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 63.9
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 208 209 211 207 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 154
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 207
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 21.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 1,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $781
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback