Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1703ZA
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 39
1-Core 114
2-Core 207
62% 120 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 500
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 928
57% 928 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1EA2) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1314
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 21.6
13% 19.5 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 27
Splatting 16.5
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZ 1TB
764GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1823 1782 1870 1815 1820 1801 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,344
Write 1,737
Mixed 1,292
SusWrite 1,818
402% 1,798 MB/s
4K Read 71.7
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 94.1
322% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 672
DQ Mixed 580
469% 663 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 336%
Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback