Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1703ZA
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '23 at 22:39
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 36.7
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 195
56% 108 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 499
52% 416 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1EA2) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1314
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 22.2
14% 20.2 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 16.5
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZ 1TB
764GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1825 1870 1889 1829 1826 1323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,541
Write 1,789
Mixed 1,421
SusWrite 1,760
420% 1,878 MB/s
4K Read 72.5
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 95.4
325% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 642
DQ Mixed 557
448% 629 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 340%
Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback