Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '23 at 16:59
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 1,036
95% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,437
89% 1,437 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8715) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 532.03
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 549 341 408 359 341 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 597
Write 924
Mixed 474
SusWrite 388
134% 596 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 51.1
174% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 1,002
DQ Mixed 441
478% 795 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 145%
Great: 291%
CSSD-MG4VT 1TB
293GB free
Firmware: SCFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 491 490 495 495 494 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 501
Mixed 484
SusWrite 492
112% 498 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 58.2
198% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 378
284% 379 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Viper M.2 VPN100 512GB
84GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,490
Write 1,924
Mixed 1,546
371% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 61.7
212% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,150
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,125
846% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 253%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
525GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 159 153 156 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 137
Write 153
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 155
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 90%
H/W DISK 2 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.8% Very poor
Read 36
Write 37.4
Mixed 34
SusWrite 12.9
40% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 39%
H/W DISK 1 8TB
1TB free, PID 0230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.7% Very poor
Read 34
Write 36
Mixed 34
SusWrite 12.9
39% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 61%
H/W DISK 3 8TB
2TB free, PID 0230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.4% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 38.5
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 12.9
40% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.8
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 26.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $1,056
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback