MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221021
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 13:21
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 85.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 844
87% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 522.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 0.3
0% 30.1 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 0.3
35% 48.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 293 283 246 155 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 962
Write 741
Mixed 441
SusWrite 244
132% 597 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 41
146% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 642
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 408
351% 520 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 124%
Great: 155%
Toshiba A100 240GB
172GB free
Firmware: SBFA10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 91 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 416
Write 290
Mixed 327
SusWrite 102
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 29.6
124% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 159
159% 253 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 91%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1665 2310 2370 2278 2352 2301 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 2,412
Write 2,098
Mixed 1,766
SusWrite 2,212
477% 2,122 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 66
229% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,612
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 1,138
890% 1,242 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 359%
Great: 507%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
88GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 105 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 113
Write 75.5
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 104
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
100GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 100 104 125 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 7.7
Write 26.9
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 110
28% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 99 101 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 118
Write 99.9
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 99
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 84%
WD WD42PURZ-85B4YY0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 168 171 172 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 54.5
Write 143
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 169
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
175% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.C16FBD2 Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $265

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $855
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback