MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201010
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 18:29
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 261
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 1,144
98% 842 Pts
64-Core 1159
72% 1159 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.3% Good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 97.5
Parallax 60.4
65% 79.2 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 69.8
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 353 352 367 370 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 960
Write 776
Mixed 596
SusWrite 370
151% 675 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 51.2
176% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 429
365% 537 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 142%
Great: 155%
Toshiba A100 240GB
210GB free
Firmware: SBFA10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 97 97 62 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 465
Write 116
Mixed 138
SusWrite 93.9
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 25.7
114% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 161
128% 184 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
673GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 167 166 165 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 138
Mixed 81
SusWrite 165
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
929GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 153 155 154 155 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 162
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 153
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
356GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 150 148 149 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 87.6
Mixed 70
SusWrite 147
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
834GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 102 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 118
Write 82.8
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 103
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.C16FBD2 Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $852
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback