Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 04:59
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 168
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 432
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 169
Parallax 174
153% 177 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 134
Splatting 115
114% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 205 209 204 209 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 431
Write 437
Mixed 314
SusWrite 218
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 34.6
116% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 257
205% 289 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 115%
WDC WD8001FZBX-00ASYA0 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 185 237 206 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 144
Write 150
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 190
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.7
9% 4.23 MB/s
DQ Read 4.5
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 4.5
4% 6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 28%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
890GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 155 156 159 153 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 139
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 154
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
207GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 110 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 106
Write 94.9
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 108
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
2TB free, PID ac35
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 101 104 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 117
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 104
136% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
178% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 24
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback