Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 23:08
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 457
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 167
Parallax 162
145% 169 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 137
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 222 206 207 209 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 468
Write 437
Mixed 359
SusWrite 214
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 35.7
119% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 257
213% 309 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 115%
WDC WD8001FZBX-00ASYA0 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 161 167 226 189 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 136
Write 132
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 178
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 1.6
9% 4.23 MB/s
DQ Read 4.8
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 4.8
4% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 28%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
903GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 125 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 123
Write 116
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 121
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
250GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 106 107 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 107
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
2TB free, PID ac35
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 110 110 101 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 103
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 106
127% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 23.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback