TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alienware m18 R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m18 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0WTGPY
Memory15 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230529
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 00:28
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 70.6
1-Core 189
2-Core 356
107% 205 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 1,116
108% 888 Pts
64-Core 2,355
146% 2,355 Pts
Poor: 108% ↑
This bench: 96.9%
 Great: 120%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0C49) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 267
Reflection 327
Parallax 349
217% 314 fps
MRender 417
Gravity 272
Splatting 217
237% 302 fps
Poor: 142% ↑
This bench: 200%
 Great: 244%
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 0C49) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 289
Parallax 12.1
9% 104 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 11.6
10% 13.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 9.23%
 Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC801 SK hynix 1TB
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51003141 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1823 1505 1426 1723 1545 1193 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 4,318
Write 2,569
Mixed 2,373
SusWrite 1536
599% 2,699 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 48.3
186% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 178
221% 416 MB/s
Poor: 176% ↑
This bench: 347%
 Great: 499%
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 2TB
780GB free
Firmware: 82A7T9PA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 1230 745 447 452 436 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 2,456
Write 1,484
Mixed 163
SusWrite 641
260% 1,186 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 28.4
96% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 55.4
DQ Mixed 96.9
177% 378 MB/s
Poor: 190% ↑
This bench: 190%
 Great: 757%
ROG ESD-S1C 1TB
273GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 776
Write 684
Mixed 628
155% 696 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 25.7
92% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 53.3
48% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 90%
Adata ED600 1TB
123GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 85 26 145 111 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 49.7
MC Mixed 52.7
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 113% ↑
This bench: 133%
 Great: 153%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical m18 R1 Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 281%
UFO

System: Alienware m18 R1

CPU
Core i9-13900HXIntelBench 115%, 8,895 samples286x
Core i9-13980HXIntelBench 117%, 4,493 samples246x
Core i7-13700HXIntelBench 108%, 3,030 samples35x
GPU
RTX 4090 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 207%, 3,538 samples206x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 8%, 10,524 samples177x
RTX 4080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 188%, 4,213 samples121x
SSD
PC801 SK hynix 1TBNvmeBench 351%, 3,744 samples73x
PM9A1 Samsung 1024GBNvmeBench 322%, 5,261 samples55x
KXG80ZN84T09 KIOXIA 4096GBNvmeBench 401%, 182 samples55x
RAM
M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GBUnknownBench 135%, 2,526 samples95x
HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GBUnknownBench 156%, 532 samples94x
HMCG88AGBSA092N 2x31.5GBUnknownBench 156%, 311 samples77x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback