MSI MPG Z690 EDGE WIFI DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D31
MotherboardMSI MPG Z690 EDGE WIFI DDR4  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221005
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 22:28
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$210
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 206
2-Core 413
123% 236 Pts
4-Core 808
8-Core 1,552
140% 1,180 Pts
64-Core 2,329
144% 2,329 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 154
Parallax 155
124% 154 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 132
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,188
Write 603
Mixed 765
257% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 77.4
301% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 779
DQ Mixed 927
722% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
178GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 475 477 488 485 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 485
Mixed 452
SusWrite 480
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 61.7
218% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 339
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 133%
Great: 131%
Patriot Blast 480GB
154GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 103 94 96 97 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 459
Mixed 388
SusWrite 129
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 39.3
158% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 178
173% 275 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 99%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
123GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 209 209 213 213 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 402
Mixed 366
SusWrite 211
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.7
190% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 230
171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
76GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 209 209 213 212 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 403
Mixed 363
SusWrite 211
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.9
188% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 229
171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 131%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
34GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,039
Write 1,431
Mixed 845
317% 1,438 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 69.6
274% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,277
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 441
428% 705 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
59GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,656
Write 2,472
Mixed 1,872
519% 2,333 MB/s
4K Read 72.1
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 107
366% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,905
DQ Write 1,929
DQ Mixed 1,962
1,462% 1,932 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
69GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,464
Write 1,722
Mixed 948
377% 1,712 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 80.8
300% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,319
DQ Write 1,356
DQ Mixed 1,135
909% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Chun Well Holding Limited D4U3236180B 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 39.5
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 34.6
104% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z690 EDGE WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D31) Builds (Compare 10,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z690 EDGE WIFI DDR4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback