Lenovo 10MQS20S00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10MQS20S00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3111
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 184
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 314
40% 305 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 6.1
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen09sm22ar512sdk 512GB 512GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 200 169 156 156 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 416
Write 374
Mixed 374
SusWrite 169
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 22.4
90% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 46.7
81% 154 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR26S19S8/8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.6% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10MQS20S00 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10MQS20S00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback