RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 09:05
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 87
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 250
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 1972) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 69.7
49% 66.6 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 62
Splatting 54.8
50% 61.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 52 51 52 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 247
Write 79.5
Mixed 63
SusWrite 51.2
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 10.9
62% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 58.1
57% 94.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 44%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
84GB free
Firmware: 0005DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 99 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 99.3
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback