HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829A
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 02:15
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.1% Poor
Memory 6.71
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 140
33% 71 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 240
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 829A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.2 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.9
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP230 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10316
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 715 919 924 565 438 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 565
Write 390
Mixed 463
SusWrite 658
117% 519 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 10.1
51% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 291
217% 285 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 222%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
466GB free
Firmware: AV0D2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 108 103 103 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 111
Write 105
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 107
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 3.9
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 435
9% 435 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback