| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus B75M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140731 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 22 '23 at 18:32 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.1%
Good
|
67% 117 Pts
|
45% 337 Pts
|
21% 340 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
|
1.41%
Terrible
|
1% 1.47 fps
|
2% 2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 107 93 89 92 90 MB/s
|
60.9%
Good
|
42% 188 MB/s
|
112% 36.2 MB/s
|
126% 182 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.7%
Below average
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
48% 84.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 622 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 109x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 89x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 53x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 76x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 55x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 37x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $435 |