Casper D300 / D200 / N100 MASAUSTU BILGISAYAR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper D300 / D200 / N100 MASAUSTU BILGISAYAR  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER H110M S2 DDR4 001
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171020
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 22 '23 at 14:35
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 218
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 381
49% 372 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 143
Parallax 205
100% 157 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 141
Splatting 91.7
94% 117 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 70 62 86 89 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 91.8
Write 78.6
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 76.2
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3H1 Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.5% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D300 / D200 / N100 MASAUSTU BILGISAYAR Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Casper D300 / D200 / N100 MASAUSTU BILGISAYAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback