Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 336%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 329%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics306% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 19:47
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$329
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 190
2-Core 376
118% 221 Pts
4-Core 707
8-Core 1150
114% 929 Pts
64-Core 1,663
103% 1,663 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$1,000
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3180 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Lighting 468
Reflection 426
Parallax 458
381% 450 fps
MRender 552
Gravity 367
Splatting 265
308% 395 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 306%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 670 671 670 665 667 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,531
Write 2,313
Mixed 1,654
SusWrite 717
403% 1,804 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 88.1
310% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,679
DQ Write 1,481
DQ Mixed 1,546
1,168% 1,569 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 311%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
99GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,500
Write 2,387
Mixed 1,720
490% 2,203 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 80.2
272% 94.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,797
DQ Write 1,589
DQ Mixed 1,673
1,260% 1,686 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
7GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 407
Mixed 363
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 18.4
99% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 15
70% 152 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
286GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 88
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 90.3
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
124GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 60 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 42.7
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 59.9
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 45%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 117 116 117 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 177
Write 172
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 116
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
217% Outstanding
MC Read 83.1
MC Write 73.8
MC Mixed 80.6
226% 79.2 GB/s
SC Read 69
SC Write 70.2
SC Mixed 67.2
197% 68.8 GB/s
Latency 49.5
81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 217%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 417%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,298
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback