Acer NG-AN515-55-73F9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer NG-AN515-55-73F9  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory16.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 13:11
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 632
66% 530 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3203
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 40
Parallax 40
33% 40 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 40
Splatting 40
33% 40 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 1TB
487GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3900 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1367 827 863 841 842 835 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,366
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,477
SusWrite 929
312% 1,384 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 57.2
187% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 847
639% 859 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 208%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 21.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NG-AN515-55-73F9 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Acer NG-AN515-55-73F9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback