CDM Q170I-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCDM Q170I-PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q170I-PLUS
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 11:52
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 175
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 567
55% 451 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.2% Good
Lighting 87.5
Reflection 85.5
Parallax 78.7
71% 83.9 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 63.9
65% 82.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 333 323 328 312 336 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 405
Mixed 381
SusWrite 311
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 42.3
138% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 249
212% 312 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 129%
Hua721010kla330 43W7625 42C0400IBM 1TB
506GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 81 82 79 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 73
Write 81.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 80.5
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.9% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q170I-PLUS Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: CDM Q170I-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback