Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2815 1,028 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Memory 18.5 1-Core 10.1 2-Core 11.6 10% 13.4 Pts	4-Core 9.7 8-Core 14.5 2% 12.1 Pts	64-Core 15.5 1% 15.5 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Quanta(152D 1075) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 52 46 54 46 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11% Very poor	Read 70.4 Write 47.1 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 56.8 14% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 3.5 16% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1x4GB 1,733 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.67% Terrible	MC Read 1.1 MC Write 1.2 MC Mixed 2.1 4% 1.47 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.6 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 332 12% 332 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 4.67% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	5x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	1x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	1x
1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 1,733 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16