Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QC_M6500QC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QC_M6500QC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M6500QC
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '23 at 15:41
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 832
87% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,023
63% 1,023 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 11D3) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.7% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 47.5
45% 58.9 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 46.5
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1963 763 807 815 845 831 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,319
Write 2,414
Mixed 1702
SusWrite 1,004
417% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 80.9
266% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,101
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 1,011
764% 1,027 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 283%
Great: 313%
WD Elements 1TB
205GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 61.1
Write 60.7
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 60.8
74% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 23
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 25.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 29.9
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QC_M6500QC Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QC_M6500QC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback