HP EliteBook 840 14 inch G10 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 14 inch G10 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B41
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '23 at 10:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel CoreT i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 63.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 290
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 585
77% 577 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8B41) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 25.9
21% 26.5 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 26.2
16% 18.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1006 1TB
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2906 2792 1143 960 1095 988 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,926
Write 2,712
Mixed 2,010
SusWrite 1,647
521% 2,324 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 77
262% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 272
268% 452 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 323%
Great: 533%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
120% Outstanding
MC Read 47.8
MC Write 50.1
MC Mixed 46.1
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 18.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 120%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 14 inch G10 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 840 14 inch G10 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback