TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-R R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 18:39
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 231
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 530
62% 480 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 79.7%
 Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Gigabyte(1458 3FC5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 97.9
Parallax 91.1
85% 97.7 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 78.4
72% 90.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 80.7%
 Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 144
Write 92.4
Mixed 181
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 19.7
77% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 22.6
54% 116 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
85GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 173 174 167 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 177
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 165
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 113%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
753GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 100 109 109 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 104
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 103
61% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 57%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 21.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 64.4%
 Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples1,888x
Core i3-9100FIntel  $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples872x
Core i3-8100Intel  $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples196x
GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples465x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples401x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples362x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples516x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples243x
SU650 240GBAdata  $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples206x
RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples505x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples167x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples117x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback