bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 15:46
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Memory 8.56
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 45.5
15% 28.7 Pts
4-Core 91.7
8-Core 101
13% 96.2 Pts
64-Core 64.1
4% 64.1 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 136GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 102 133 149 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 200
Mixed 182
SusWrite 128
135% 182 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.6
435% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 4GB
0, 0 MHz
3968, 128 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 14.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 417
10% 417 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback