Lenovo 82H8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82H8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220115
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 12:58
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 118
53% 87 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 224
24% 193 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4311
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 5.4
3% 9.03 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 5.4
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PNY CS1030 256GB SSD
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103D10 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 347 122 348 205 298 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 586
Write 574
Mixed 574
SusWrite 278
113% 503 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 34.9
118% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 243
175% 229 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 231%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
632GB free
Firmware: JU0A2E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 99 97 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 136
Write 124
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 98.2
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
227% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 18.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82H8 Builds (Compare 4,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82H8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback