HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory33.5 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 08:33
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5687
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 171
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 601
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2182 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 121
Parallax 126
112% 128 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 106
Splatting 90.9
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,231
Write 2748
Mixed 2,932
662% 2,970 MB/s
4K Read 134
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 71.3
334% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 298
227% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
11GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,234
Write 808
Mixed 545
190% 862 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 32.6
112% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 334
246% 326 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 243%
WD My Book 25DA 6TB
426GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 90
113% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback