Huananzhi X79-8D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X79-8D  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '23 at 18:05
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 115
48% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 512
43% 371 Pts
64-Core 1,682
104% 1,682 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 59.1
52% 71.3 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 58.8
51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 458
Write 420
Mixed 402
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 32.5
105% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 199
154% 211 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 131 133 133 133 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 157
Write 43.1
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 133
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70QB0- 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 40.3
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-8D Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-8D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback