Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 19:35
Run Duration393 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900F-$240
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 176
2-Core 318
107% 196 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 1,103
107% 879 Pts
64-Core 1613
100% 1613 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 242
Reflection 218
Parallax 212
197% 224 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 162
Splatting 130
143% 183 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 163%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
772GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 371 367 374 373 371 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,450
Write 1,774
Mixed 1,299
SusWrite 503
282% 1,256 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 69.6
257% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 1,169
DQ Mixed 1199
907% 1,217 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 222%
Great: 276%
SABRENT 1TB
388GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 190 190 189 182 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 87%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
762GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 98 102 107 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 76.1
Write 82.6
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 97.6
64% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
235% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 92%
SDK SSD 12.5TB
11.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.1 4.8 4 3.4 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 49.8
Write 4
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.3
13% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
344GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 113 113 114 113 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 169
Write 166
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 112
176% 134 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.6
379% 9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 0.6
331% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
258GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 114 114 113 112 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 99
Write 106
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 111
139% 101 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.4
367% 4.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 4.6
DQ Mixed 1.8
221% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
605GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 115 116 115 114 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 93.8
Write 83.3
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 113
121% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 0.8
445% 8.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 0.6
410% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 105%
JMicron Generic DISK01 2TB
467GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 57 57 63 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 6
Write 53.7
Mixed 9.4
SusWrite 58.4
50% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 71%
JMicron Generic DISK02 1TB
333GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 89 80 107 3.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 240
Write 189
Mixed 202
SusWrite 74.6
227% 176 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 16.5
1,313% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 17.5
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 20.8
1,653% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 118%
Great: 70%
JMicron Generic DISK00 2TB
629GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.1 0.1 34 103 2.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 192
Mixed 204
SusWrite 23.4
206% 161 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 16.7
1,318% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 21.9
DQ Mixed 18.7
1,438% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 104%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK04 4TB
23GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Read 43.7
Write 59.6
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 0.1
51% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 64%
JMicron Generic DISK03 2TB
275GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 113
Write 111
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 76.9
122% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 55%
Prolific USB-SATA Bridge 4TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 103 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 103
147% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
221GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 90.1
Write 95.8
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 93.1
130% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
210% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 31.2
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 30.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback