LG A75CV.ATG321

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG A75CV.ATG321  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7886
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 17:35
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3260
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 37.1
2-Core 94
38% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 82.7
8-Core 62.8
10% 72.8 Pts
64-Core 31.5
2% 31.5 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.1% Good
Lighting 84.8
Reflection 87
Parallax 82.7
69% 84.8 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 77.1
Splatting 39.1
54% 70.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aitc KSM 512GB SSD
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220115
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 23 10 23 185 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 228
Write 205
Mixed 217
SusWrite 60.7
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 25
90% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 130
108% 156 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D18ADS3.16FE 0420 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 12GB
1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.4
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75CV.ATG321 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: LG A75CV.ATG321

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback