Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 204%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive419% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 11:00
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$164
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 335
105% 196 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1,007
101% 823 Pts
64-Core 1331
82% 1331 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
Zotac(19DA 1714) ≥ 4GB; Zotac 4070
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
198% Outstanding
Lighting 280
Reflection 268
Parallax 282
228% 276 fps
MRender 362
Gravity 246
Splatting 194
210% 267 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 198%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2848 2975 2958 2736 1534 1559 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
419% Outstanding
Read 2,662
Write 3,281
Mixed 2,919
SusWrite 2,435
639% 2,824 MB/s
4K Read 77.6
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 107
349% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,314
DQ Write 1,154
DQ Mixed 1,226
921% 1,231 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 419%
Great: 477%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 234140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1963 2459 2452 2451 2446 2446 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
394% Outstanding
Read 2431
Write 2513
Mixed 2,145
SusWrite 2,369
533% 2,365 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 78.6
285% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,508
DQ Write 1,408
DQ Mixed 1,462
1,096% 1,460 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 394%
Great: 469%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
285GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 426 416 447 434 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 222
Mixed 275
SusWrite 432
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 52
174% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 178
143% 203 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 126%
SanDisk Extreme 480GB-$200
387GB free
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 248 237 226 244 245 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 421
Write 275
Mixed 302
SusWrite 241
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 19.9
69% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 133
104% 147 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 66%
Samsung 960 EVO 500G 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 362 362 363 364 364 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
65% Good
Read 222
Write 356
Mixed 231
SusWrite 355
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 28.2
91% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 142
104% 138 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 40.1
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 32.2
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 38.4
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback