Asus GL552VXK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus GL552VXK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VXK
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 09:22
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 173
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 468
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 17B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 6.8
5% 8.77 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 0.2
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB-$60
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 109 58 55 52 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 460
Write 348
Mixed 374
SusWrite 115
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 27.3
98% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 52.7
92% 178 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
480GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 86 87 91 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 51.4
Write 81
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 87
51% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD824A.C16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.3% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 20.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VXK Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552VXK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback