QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory31.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.9GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory26.7 GB free of 31.9121 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 22:11
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core
, 1 CPU, 30 cores, 30 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 1,084
96% 815 Pts
64-Core 2,695
167% 2,695 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
ASRock(1849 5202) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
159% Outstanding
Lighting 195
Reflection 196
Parallax 404
159% 265 fps
MRender 277
Gravity 161
Splatting 289
202% 242 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 159%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 698GB
24GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 27 51 34 26 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
Read 535
Write 40.8
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 33.2
35% 164 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 13.5
64% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 26.1
DQ Mixed 42.3
40% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%
Qemu HARDDISK 137GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,518
Write 1,430
Mixed 1,484
1,114% 1,478 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 25.7
4,403% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 109
1,000% 109 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 86%
Qemu HARDDISK 137GB
0GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,464
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,522
1,122% 1,487 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 25.9
4,437% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 105
972% 107 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 16294 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 42.4
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 31.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 111%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback