HP 700-029eb

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 700-029eb  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 14:58
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 502
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 69.3
59% 72.5 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 69.4
57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 422 446 450 454 443 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 452
Mixed 438
SusWrite 406
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 42.9
142% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 265
224% 327 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-029eb Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: HP 700-029eb

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback